Showing posts with label mrinal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mrinal. Show all posts

Sunday, October 10, 2010

PROSPECTIVE IMPACT ON THE PROPOSED GST REGIME IN INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT

Sub-clause (3) of clause 100 read with entry 48 of the Government India Act, 1935 empowered the Provincial Legislatures of the British ruled India to make laws on the specified subjects. In Assam, the first tax laws were enacted 1939 on the sales of petroleum, on agricultural income and on amusement and betting. With the evaluation of time, a series of taxation laws were introduced in the post independent era. At present, as many as eight State tax laws and one Central tax laws are operative in Assam. These tax laws are- (i) on the sales and purchases of goods, the Value Added Tax or VAT, (ii) entry of goods, (iii) professions, trades, callings and employments, (iv) amusement and betting, (v) specified lands, (vi) Luxuries provided in Hotels and Lodging Houses,(vii) agricultural income, (viii) electricity and central sales. The VAT law has been operative in Assam since 1st May, 2005. It is a broad -based tax. The perimeter of the VAT is wide and each State has its own law on VAT.

The Government of India, since some couple of years has been contemplating to introduce a new tax measure in the States of the Indian sub-continent. An ardent exercise is going on to materialize the venture by introducing the Goods & Services Tax (GST). It seems to be a refined form of VAT, but it is intended to make the base more wide multifarious designed. A part from the tax on sales and purchases of goods, a number of tax measures on State and the Union tax are proposed to be merged to give birth to a unified tax law.

GST is not simply VAT plus Service tax, but it seeks a recast and renovation on VAT. GST is a tax on the goods and services with the comprehensive and continuous chain of set-off benefits from producers’ as well as service providers’ level upto the retail sellers, so as to say, the consumers’ level. It is essentially a tax on the value addition at each stage and a supplier at each stage will be eligible for set-off, through a tax credit mechanism. The GST purchased goods and services are available for set-off on the GST to be paid on the supply of the goods and services. The consumers will bear the burden of last tax (GST), charged in the supply chain only. The multiplicity of tax component is not to be occurred, which will have the consequential effect that the price hike burden to the consumers will be lesser. The illustration, given below, will make the position clear-

GST at the manufacturers’ level- (i) purchase value say, Rs. 100.00, (ii) value addition Rs. 30.00,(iii) sale value of the goods and services Rs. 130.00, (iv) tax rate 10 paise in the rupee,(v) GST(out put tax) Rs. 13.00, (vi) input tax credit Rs. 10.00, (vii) net GST (out put tax) Rs. 13.00- (input tax credit) Rs. 10.00= Rs.3.00. Unlike Rs. 13.00 in VAT, out put tax is to be charged at Rs.3.00.
GST at the whole selles’ level -(i) purchase value say, Rs. 130.00, (ii) value addition Rs. 20.00 (iii) sale value of goods and services Rs. 150.00 (iv) tax rate 10 paise in the rupee, (v) GST (out put tax) Rs. 15.00 (vi) input tax credit Rs. 13.00, (vii) net GST (out put tax) Rs. 15.00 –(input tax credit) Rs. 13.00= Rs. 2.00. Unlike Rs. 15.00in VAT, out put tax is to be charged at Rs. 2.00.
GST at the retail sellers’ level- (i) purchase value say, Rs. 150.00, (ii) value addition Rs. 10.00 (iii) sale value of goods and services Rs.10.00, (iii) sale value of goods and services at Rs. 160.00 (iv) tax rate 10 paise in the rupee, (v) GST (out put tax) Rs. 16.00 (vi) input tax credit Rs. 15.00), (vii) Net GST (out put tax) Rs. 16.00 – (input tax credit) Rs. 15.00= e. 1.00. Unlike Rs. 16.00 in VAT, out put tax is to be charged at Re.1.00.

So, unlike VAT regime, the price level is likely to go down and the consumers will be benefitted. The distinction between VAT and GST is that : (a)VAT provides multiplicity of tax at each stage of sale; (b) Payment of sale price on inclusion of the value added tax;
The GST provides that:(a)The difference of tax is payable; (b) A transparent and complete chain of set-off is maintained.

It is likely to widen the coverage of tax base and improve tax compliance. The higher generation of revenue with the lower burden of tax element to the consumers seems to be the moto of the proposed GST regime.

The Central Excise Duty is in fact, leviable at manufacturing point before removal of the goods from the manufacturing spot and such Excise Duty is to be collected and deposited, when the goods are removed from the business premises. The Service Tax is charged on the date of handing over of service or on the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier. The VAT, on the other hand, is to be charged at the time of sale of the goods, whether the payment is readily made or there is deferred payment. The GST will ease out such matters. The GST is to be charged on each transact.

The items of taxability in the GST system will be, as below:
(a)on the sale of goods; (b)incorporation of goods in an individual contract; (c)hiring a taxi;(d) hiring equipment; (e)lease of a premises; (f)consultation by a chartered accountant; (g)import & export of the goods; (h)) rendering of any service; an (i)) a transfer of immovable properties etc”. So, its perimeter will be wider.

The GST being chargeable on each transaction, it may also be called as the’ transaction tax’. It is likely to abolish the interpretational problems whether a particular transaction is goods or services; applicability of State or Central levy or applicability of a particular rate, as may arise. So, the GST will have a separate characteristic and its impact will be large and wide.

Unlike the tax laws on the sales or purchases of goods, the levy of tax will not be confined to the moveable properties only. It will extend to the immovable properties as well. For instance-

(i)The lease of premise is nothing but a lease of immovable goods. Actually, the dictionary meaning of the term ‘lease’ is ‘a contract by which one party lets land, property, services etc. to another for a specific time, in return for money. (ii)Levy of duty on premises, that is, on the immovable properties is presently a subject matter of the State revenue department;

Consequently, with the introduction of the GST, any such laws will naturally be irrelevant and will turn to be redundant. The salient features are discussed below:
(i)India is a federal structure of country. The State Governments and the Central Government, apart from other essential ingredients, have been empowered to undertake the economic administration within the frame work of the Constitution, subject to the conditions, restrictions and limitations imposed therein. The GST will have, therefore, mainly two components;
(a) one levied by the Centre; (b) the other levied by the States.
This dual GST model will be implemented through multiple statutes –
(a)CGST for Centre; and (b) SGST for every States.

The basic issues ,like; chargeability, definitions, taxable persons, measure of levy of tax including the voluntary provisions, basis of classification and other allied matters, will be governed by the uniform statutes, as far as practicable.
(ii) Both CGST and SGST would be applicable to all transactions of goods and services except the exempted goods and services, goods, which are to be kept outside the purview of GST. Similar will be the case in respect of the transaction, which is below the quantum limit.
(iii) The taxes paid against the CGST and the SGST are to be credited in two separate accounts. The input credit derived from the CGST is to be utilized for the Central, while likewise the SGST input derived, is to be utilized for the respective States.
(v)Cross utilization of the ITC (Input Tax Credit) between CGST and SGST is not generally permissible.
(vi) The feasible uniform procedure for collection of both CGST and SGST would be prescribed in the respective legislation for the Central and the States.
(vii)The power of administration of the CGST will rest with the Centre, while that of SGST administration with the States.
(viii)Tax return for the relevant period is to be submitted by the tax payers both to the CGST and SGST authorities.
(ix) The tax payers would be allotted a PAN Card, as a tax payer’s identification number. The GST Pan-linked system with a total 13/15 digits to be worked out in consultation with the Income Tax department, will mainly be linked with the Income tax PAN system, facilitating exchange of data and tax payer’s compliance.
(x)Assessment, enforcement, scrutiny and audit would be undertaken by the authorities, which will be engaged for collecting the tax with information sharing between the Centre and the States.

In addition to the above, the deals at the inter-State level will be termed as the Inter-State GST (IGST). The utilization of the inter-State supply of goods and services will be made under the IGST model. The ITC will be from the respective inter-State level.
‘Dual’ means - ‘two fold.’ India is a federal structured country. The Central and the State Governments have been provided with power to rule the country with the division of powers enunciated in the Constitution. In the economic scenario, particularly in relation to the levy and collection of tax, appropriate legislation is to be worked out by Parliament and the State Legislatures, as envisaged in clause (1) of Article 246 read with List I (Union List) and clause (3) of Article 246 read with List II (State List). In addition to the above clause (2) of Article 246 read with List- III (Concurrent List), the power can be exercised by the Union and the States concurrently. The Central and the State Governments are to be empowered to perform their distinctive duties in making enactments in the matter of raising revenue resources vis-a-vis guarding any possible leakage or drainage of revenue. A dual GST is a product of fiscal federalism, keeping in view, the Constitutional requirement.
The basic architecture for subsumation designed in the GST system and l the principle formulated thereof, are-
(i)Taxes or levies to be subsumed should primarily in the nature of indirect taxes, either on the supply of the goods or on the supply of services; (ii) Taxes on levies to be subsumed, should be part of the transaction chain, which commences with the import/manufacture/production of goods or provision of services at one end and the consumption of goods and services on the other; (iii)The subsumation should result in free flow of tax credit in intra-State and inter-State levels; (iv)The taxes levied and the fees, those are specially related to the supply of the goods and services, should not be subsumed under GST; (v)Revenue fairness for both Union and States individually would need to be attempted.
The basic principle of the GST being as such, the Empowered Committee recommended that the following Central Taxes, administered by the Government of India, ab-initio, are to be subsumed under the Goods and Services Tax net;
(a)Central Excise Duty; (b) Additional Excise Duty;(c) The Central Duty levied under the Medicinal and Toiletries; (d) Preparation Act;(e) Service Tax;Additional Customs Duty, commonly known as Countervailng Duty (CVD) (f) Special Additional Duty of Customs- 4% (SAD); (g)Surcharges; and (h)Cesses
Likewise, the following State taxes have been proposed to be incorporated in the GST net:
(a)VAT/Sales tax;(b) Entertainment tax (unless it is levied by the local bodies);(c) Luxury tax; (d)Taxes on lottery, betting and gambling (e) State Cesses and Surcharges in so far as they relate to supply of goods and services; and (f)Entry tax not in lieu of Octroi.
The movement of goods, occurring from one State to another, not by way of sale, but by way of stock transfer for the purpose of sale out side the State or for any manufacturing activities or for other purposes, is restricted from levy of any tax, as laid down in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) of Article 286 of the Constitution. Any levy of tax is, therefore, beyond the ambit and competence of the State Legislatures. The Central Act has exempted tax on the said stock transfer of goods subject to some conditions and restrictions with production of satisfactory evidences. The GST literature has not reflected properly as to the question taxability or otherwise of the goods to be moved from one State to another on stock transfer. However, time will say as to the modus operandi of this tax measure.
The following will be excluded in the GST tax net :
(a) Direct Taxes; (b) Property Taxes; (c) Stamp Duties; (d) Toll Tax; (e) Passenger Tax; (f)Road Tax; (g)Telecom(h) Licence Fee; and 9i)Tax on Electricity.
The Central Government constituted the State Empowered Committee to work out the ways and means, to examine and to prepare a road map on the proposed system of the GST, as done in the case of VAT. T is on the heels to carry out such a heavy responsibility. The Empowered Committee with the concurrence of the Central Government like wise constituted a Joint Working Committee Group with a view to study the models of the GST in the global sphere, if necessary, to provide alternative suggestions, keeping in view India’s fiscal position. The suggestions of the Joint Working Group will include as well the following :
(i)The GST is to be a revenue- fair with sufficient growth of revenue to the Centre and the States. Interest of Special Category, North East States and the Union Territories have to receive due consideration. (II)A study by the group will be necessary in which power of levy, collection and appropriation of revenue by the Centre and State should be categorically mentioned besides providing the manner with the pros and cons of the various identical models. (III)There should not be any double taxation. (IV)The problems faced in the matter of inter-State transactions and revenue loss should have a suitable end. (V)A suitable solution over the question of exempted, non-VAT items, petroleum products and alcohol might be well treated by exclusion from the GST regime. (VI)The trade, industry, agriculture and the consumers’ interest are well guarded and the Central-State relationship is maintained cordially.
. The present multifarious system of tax has practically crippled the economy of the country. A commodity has to suffer various incidence of tax right from the production to reach the consumers’ hands by this way or that. The tax levied in different aspect is approximately about 27.5%. In GST regime, such total incidence of tax is likely to be reduced and to come down within approximate perimeter of 20%. Obviously, a reduction of the quantum of tax levy is expected.

High rate of tax generally paves the way for mounting evasion of taxes. A trader develops the mentality to escape from heavy burden of tax and adopts various fraudulent means to evade taxes. This is long grown phenomenon of the traders if reduced considerably, the trend and tendency of evasion of tax, is likely to be minimised to a considerable extent. However, it can not be said categorically that such a modus- operandi will take a final good-bye. It can, however, be well expected that the revenue generation will be accelerated to a considerable extent.

Globalization of economy is now one of the min themes of the world nations. Any good tax policy aims at social and cultural up-liftment, global economic realities, administrative efficiency, technological development, economic growth, stability, equity, to ensure welfare of the economically weaker and the vulnerable sections of population. GST will cut the cascading effect and thus can benefit not only to the consumers but also to the industry at large.The intentions of the global nations are as well to make out an all round competition at the global levels and it is not necessarily on the regional or country basis. All are eager to adopt common tax system, uniforms and simple, as well a common marketing platform. There is a common thought that the lower rate of tax will yield higher revenue, as the tax dodging episode is likely to be reduced, when there is lesser burden of tax.

The GST law will be an amalgamation of the measure of tax by the State, the Centre and also at the inter-State level. The powers and functions will as well be divisible amongst the three. The respective provisions of law and the power exercise, it is believed, will maintain their own entity. A question naturally crops up whether Parliament will be vested with the power to make enactment of the GST law or the State Legislature will be responsible for enactment of the portion of law relating to the respective States. That is a policy matter and no comment at this stage seems necessary. However, apprehension is there that the States may lose their autonomy and will be forced to be dependent on the centre in all spheres.
The literature on the GST provided an idea that there will be a drastic change in the Central and State tax structure. Such change will only be possible, when bases are prepared in the Constitution. At present the power scenario of the Centre and States are divisible in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. If any unified law is enacted, the Constitutional set up will require amendment. An amendment of the Constitution will thus be imperative and the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution (Union List, State List and Concurrent List) will require renovation.

(Mrinal Kanti Chakrabartty)
“Rudra Bhawan”, Radha Govinda Barua Road, 10 Lakhimipth,Guwahati-781-024

Friday, September 17, 2010

The Asam Sahitya Sabha : Bahumukhi Achani Grahan Prahashan Swarup

‘The Asam Sahitya Sabha : Bahumukhi Achani Grahan Prahashan Swarup’, the article published
in the Janasadhran Newspaper on 17th September 2010 , written by Shri Mrinal Kanti Chakrabartty, is a part-projection of the inner happenings of the Asam Sahitya Sabha, a linguistic, literary and cultural Organization, the largest forum of the North Eastern Region of the Indian sub-continent. Actually, it has been a den of politics and no proper importance has been
given towards the desired aim and object of the Sabha. The lobby system has been getting the
momentum in this linguistic, literary and cultural Organization. The system of election of
the office bearers has gradually become a farce. The actual idealistic literary persons are
not getting berth in this secret forum. The money hunting- activities for personal gain
plays a pivotal role in this august platform and the scandalous activities are coming to the
light from time to time. There is no proper respect to the Sabha Constitution, as has been
projected. The self-designed highhandedness is getting priority, instead of following up
democratic tradition in this great reputed organization.

Here the link http://www.janasadharan.in/1/images/4.jpg

Friday, July 9, 2010

MYSTERIOUS WAY TO EXTRACT TAX ON GREEN TEA LEAVES

The tea garden lands of Assam have been playing a prominent role in the agricultural, industrial and commercial aspects in the State scenario. The State is blessed with the flow of incoming revenue derived out of tax on sales, tax on agricultural income, tax on specified land, apart from the land revenue, revenue on electricity duty, revenue on professions, trades, employments etc. tax. Though the Assam tea has been facing an acute competition in the global commercial market, the good name of the Assam tea is still being maintained, as a whole.
Some pertinent question in relation to the measures of tax, adopted in Assam has apparently been visible and it is necessary to make an analysis on the same.
Exemption of tax on Green tea leaves
The First Schedule of the VAT Act has specified series of goods, exempted from tax under Section 9 of the VAT Act and hence no tax is leviable on the sales of such goods made within the State of Assam. The sales of such goods made in the course of inter-State trade or commerce are as well to be treated as tax free. Entry 41 of the said Schedule laid -down that ‘Unprocessed green leaves of tea’ is exempted from tax. The ‘Tentative Commodity List of Vatable Goods’, finalized by the Empowered Committee, contained also that ‘Unprocessed green leaves of tea’ is exempted from tax under the VAT Act.
.Concept of Specified Land Act
Clause (3) of Article 246 read with entry 49 of List-II (State List) in the Constitution vested powers to the State Legislature to make law in respect of ‘Tax on Land and Building’. In exercise of the said powers, the Legislatures of Assam enacted the “Assam Taxation (On Specified Lands) Act, 1990” (Lands Act), which came into effect from the 1st January, 1990.
The preamble of the Lands Act laid down that it is a tax imposed on certain categories of land. The levy of such tax is to be made on the annual productivity of such specified lands. The specified lands includes, inter-alia, the tea garden lands and the annual productivity of the green tea leaves on weight (in Kilogram) basis is the measuring scale for the purpose of levy of tax on such tea garden lands.
In the original Act effective from the 1st January, 1990, the rate of tax was fixed at 50 paise per Kilogram. The validity of the Lands Act was challenged by a number of tea gardens and tea organizations before the Gauhati High Court and the Supreme Court of India. During the pendency of the cases, however, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed between the Government of Assam and the various tea organizations and the rate of tax was reduced from 50 paise to 18 paise with a retrospective effect from the 1st January, 1990. The Lands Act was amended from time to time and with effect from 31st March, 1997, the tea garden lands, the aggregate area of which did not exceed four hectares, were exempted from payment of such land tax.
The numbers of tea estate in Assam and the production of green tea leaves in such tea estates, as were projected in the Statistical Hand Book of Assam, 2007 are, as below:
Year Nos. Quantity produced (in weight)
2002- 43272 43,33,27,000 Kg.
2003- 43293 43,47,59,000 Kg.
2004- 43296 43,56,49,000 Kg.
2005 - 47,41,37,000 Kg.
The numbers of tea gardens and the productivity of tea thereof must have gone to a much higher side during these long five or six years, which particular is, however, not available readily. The collection of tax under the Lands Act was ascertained from the tax department sources, which is as below :
2002-2003 – Rs. 52.93 crore
2003-2004 - Rs. 56.17 “
2004-2005- Rs. 45.29 “
2005-2006 - Rs. 52.18 “
2006-2007- Rs. 53.68 “
The revenue yield from the green tea leaves under the Lands Act seems to be not upto the mark and due taxes were not likely to have been paid by a number of tea gardens.
Some of the tea estates, the numbers of which are exhibited above, do not have any tea manufacturing units (industrial units). Those tea garden units use to make sale of the green tea leaves to the tea industrial units for manufacture and sales of black tea. The numbers of tea manufacturing units in Assam are roughly in between 750 and 800. Some tea gardens, as it could be learnt, made bifurcation or trifurcation of the original units and made the same smaller ones so as to enjoy the benefit of exemption of taxes, as provided in the amended Lands Act of 1997 effective from 31st March, 1997. A huge loss of revenue is thus being incurred annually since 1997-98.
Proposal to levy Cess on the bought- tea leaves in Assam
While presenting the Budget for the 2008-2009 in the House of Legislature of Assam on the 10th March, 2008, the Chief Minister of Assam submitted as proposal before the House for levy of Cess on the green tea leaves. The portion of the speech is reproduced hereunder:
“A large number of bought-leaf factories have come up in Assam. These bought –leaf factories purchase green leaf and manufacture tea. However, unlike established tea companies, these bought-leaf factories do not contribute any revenue to the State Exchequer. They are unable to maintain quality of tea. At present, these bought-tea factories and some established companies who manufacture tea from bought-leaf do not pay any Cess on green tea leaf purchased by them. I propose to levy Cess at therate of 20 paise per kilogram of green tea leaf purchased by them. This rate is much lower than the rate at which the established tea companies pay Cess. The established tea companies pay Cess at the rate of 32 paise per kilogram of green tea leaf in Brahmaputra Valley and 29 paise per kilogram of green tea in Barak Valley. I propose to raise a Development Fund from the revenue collected for development of small and marginal tea growers, welfare of the tea labourers in organized sector and improvement of quality of Assam tea.”
‘Cess’ means a tax or duty. A cess or duty is not generally levied on the sale or purchase of goods for which separate enactment, namely; the VAT Act is there. It is generally levied other than on the sale or purchase of goods. The Budget proposal of the Chief Minister of Assam contained that a Cess would be levied on the sale of green tea leaves at the rate of 20 paise in the rupee. The proposal did not indicate specifically the Act under which such Cess was proposed to be levied.
Tax measures under Lands Act
The Legislatures of Assam by an amendment of the Lands Act ( Assam Act IV of 2009) incorporated some provisions in the Lands Act and the same was given effect from the 12th day of February, 2009. The amendment reads as:
Section 6A-“ Every person engaged in manufacture of tea and responsible for making any payment or discharging any liability on account of any amount purported to be the full or part payment of sale price or consideration for purchase of green tea leaf, shall, at the time of credit to the account of or payment to the seller of such amount in cash, by cheque, by adjustment or in any manner, whatsoever, deduct tax calculated at the rate 20 paise per kilogram and deposit the same in the State Exchequer in such manner as may be prescribed.”
(The rate of such tax was enhanced to 25 paise per kilogram with effect from 29.04.2010.)
The said amendment provided also : (i) the ways and means for deduction of tax at source and deposit thereof and to issue a tax deduction certificate to the sellers of the green tea leaves by the purchasers; (ii) submission of return and statement of deduction of tax by the purchasers; (iii) interest for non-deduction and non deposit of the deducted tax at the rate of 1.5 paise per month; (iv) imposition of penalty for any violation of the provisions of the Lands Act and (v) institution of case in the court of law for any offence.
Levy of tax on the sales of green tea leaves- controversial
In the amendment of Lands Act, the authority of law under which such amendment was made has not been quoted. It also maintained silence as to the authority under which the tax was levied on the sale or purchase of such green tea leaves in the said Lands Act, contrary to the basic principle of levy of tax on the tea gardens lands on the productivity of green tea leaves as the measuring scale.
The question of law as has been cropped up in such exercise are discussed below :
(1) The item green tea leaf is exempted from tax, as exhibited in the First Schedule of the VAT Act. Hence, no tax is leviable on the sale or purchase of such green tea leaves under the VAT Act, which was enacted under the authority of clause (3) of Article 246 read with entry 54 of List II (State List) in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution;
(2) No other Constitutional authority was provided to levy tax on the sale of such green tea leaves, sold by the producing tea garden to the manufacturing tea gardens;
(3) The main theme and ideology of the Lands Act is that, a tax is leviable under the Act, on the annual productivity of the green tea leaves, produced. The said Act provided no scope to levy of tax on the sale or purchase of green tea leaves, which ,in fact, are exempted from the sales tax under the VAT Act, governing the principle of levy of tax on the sale or purchase of goods in Assam ;
(4) When the aggregate area of the tea garden lands held by a person does not exceed four hectares, no tax is leviable on such lands, implying thereby that the annual productivity of green tea leaves in respect such tea garden lands, are not to be reckoned for the purpose of taxability under the said Lands Act;
(5) The new measure of tax on the sales of green tea leaves incorporated in the Lands Act from 12.02.2009 obviously created a clash and conflict with the provisions VAT Act as well as a portion of the Lands Act;
(6) The tax deduction on the weight of the green tea leaves (on the basis of kilogram) has a direct clash with the principle of levy of tax on the sale or purchase of goods, where value consideration gains the momentum;
(7) The new measure of levy of tax seems to be something unforeseen and extra-ordinary, as the newly inserted Section 6A was a measure to deduct tax at source, while liability to pay tax on such sales of green tea leaves was not given berth in the amended Lands Act;
(8) The term ‘sale’ has not been defined in the Lands Act and the basic principle of levy of tax on the sales of green tea leaves also not accommodated in the Lands Act and it seems to some extent as extra-ordinary exercise of territorial jurisdiction;
(9) The basic ingredients required for the levy of tax on the sales of green tea leaves has not been incorporated in the Lands Act;
(10) The amended Act incorporated the levy of ‘tax’ on green tea leaves is contrary to proposal of levy of ‘Cess’, as reflected in the Budget speech of the Chief Minister of Assam.
The entire matter relating to levy of tax on green tea leaves seems to be controversial and review is necessary by the Government.
Solution suggested
This zig-zag process of levy of tax may have a far-reaching ill consequence to the revenue generation of the State. Since the intention of the Legislature of the State to safe guard the revenue of the State by way of levy of tax on the green tea leaves sold to the bought-leaf factories for manufacture black tea and to make sale, therefore, the Government may consider the following suggestions for the greater interest of the revenue of the State:
(i) That, the exemption tax in respect of the aggregate area of the specified lands held by a person a person not exceeding four hectares of land, as occurred in clause (a) of Section 5 of the Lands Act, may be revoked or withdrawn;
(ii) The lands, held by a person not exceeding four hectares of land, are also to be brought under the purview of tax- net of the lands Act and the provision of the said Act has to be applied in all cases;
(iii) The liability to make payment of tax, submission of returns will rest with such tea garden land owners, as envisaged in the Lands Act and the rules, framed thereunder.
However, in order to ensure that proper payment of tax has been made by such land owners, it may made as a condition that the green tea leaves handed over to the tea manufacturing factories, such land owners are to adduce proof that the tax due to State Exchequer has been paid. In alternative, such manufacturing factories may be authorized to deduct the requisite tax, while making payment green tea leaves for manufacturing or other allied purposes. The appropriate wordings will be’ the green tea leaves placed with the tea factories for manufacture or other allied purposes instead of the words ‘sale or purchase of green tea leaves’.

(Mrinal Kanti Chakrabartty)
“ Rudra Bhawan”
R.G. Barua Road, 10- Lakhimipath, Guwahati-781024